Merge branch 'patch-1' into 'master'

[fix]image not displaying 2018-06-18-duniter-deep-dive-wot.md

See merge request websites/website_en!28

content/2018-06-18-duniter-deep-dive-wot.md

@@ -201,15 +201,15 @@ The distance rule is there to curb the maximum size of a Sybil region as well as
 The Sybil regions are isolated from the rest of the graph in the sense that they can only receive certifications from other ill-intentioned Sybil members. As a consequence, the shortest edge/path between a legitimate member and a Sybil one has to have the attack’s author as an endpoint. The maximum depth the Sybil region can attain is therefore contingent on the distance between the attacking edge-s- and the xpercent% closest referent members, this distance is known as `stepAttackers`.
 The maximum size of a Sybil region created by `sigQty` members depends on the L parameter, defined as L = sigQty/sigStock:
 
-    Maximum Sybil region size = -sigStock-sigQty-*-1-L^-stepMax-stepAttackers--/-1-L-
+    Maximum Sybil region size = (sigStock-sigQty)*(1-L^(stepMax-stepAttackers))/(1-L)
 
 The maximum size of the Web of Trust is given by the following formula:
 
-    WoTmax = -sigStock-*L^-stepMax-1-
+    WoTmax = (sigStock)*L^(stepMax-1)
 
 However we know for a fact that members will never use all of their available certifications. Many studies have proven that we all know a maximum average of 50 people, let’s then replace sigStock by 50:
 
-  WoTavg= -50-*-sigQty/50-^-stepMax-1-
+    WoTavg= (50)*(sigQty/50)^(stepMax-1)
 
 Our goal with the Ğ1 is to create a community of about 1 million members enjoying the world’s first true [catallaxy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catallaxy) -free economy with a spontaneous order of things-. Let’s see how we can tweak the pair of sigQty and stepMax- to reach this size:
 
@@ -217,15 +217,15 @@ Our goal with the Ğ1 is to create a community of about 1 million members enjoyi
 
 The maximum size of a Sybil region grows linearly with `sigQty` but exponentially with `stepMax`. Logic has it that we need to keep `stepMax` as low as possible to ensure sufficient strength to the web. The above graph shows that the lowest value of `stepMax` for a web of a million members is of 5. This is an order of magnitude and is likely to be much higher in reality, we cannot measure it for sure.
  
-For `sigQty` we can choose a value of **4** for a web of **1.5 million members** or **5** for **half a million members**. Calculating WOTavg gives us a pretty good idea of how the web would scale bearing in mind that it considers all members are referent members too -which isn’t the case as explained previously-. Hence the maximum size of the web is likely larger, a ballpark figure of half a million is enough for now especially knowing that the smaller `sigQty` is, the easier it is to launch a Sybil attack -it’s easier to find four accomplices than five-. For security reasons we have settled on five:
+For `sigQty` we can choose a value of **4** for a web of **1.5 million members** or **5** for **half a million members**. Bear in mind these are gross figures and could be significantly higher, we are talking anywhere between 1 and 10 million in reality. Calculating WOTavg gives us a pretty good idea of how the web would scale bearing in mind that it considers all members are referent members too -which isn’t the case as explained previously-. Hence the maximum size of the web is likely larger, a ballpark figure of half a million is enough for now especially knowing that the smaller `sigQty` is, the easier it is to launch a Sybil attack -it’s easier to find four accomplices than five-. For security reasons we have settled on five:
 
 stepMax = 5
 sigQty = 5
 sigStock >= 50
 
-The maximum size of a Sybil region therefore is: `-sigStock-sigQty-*-1--sigStock/5-^-5-stepAttackers--/-1--sigStock/5--`
+The maximum size of a Sybil region therefore is: `(sigStock-sigQty)*(1-(sigStock/5)^(5-stepAttackers))/(1-(sigStock/5))`
 
-with sigStock = 50 we have a Sybil region of: `45*-1-10^-5-stepAttackers--/--9-`
+with sigStock = 50 we have a Sybil region of: `45*(1-10^(5-stepAttackers))/(-9)`
 
 A good practice for protecting the web is to maximise `stepAttackers`. That’s why we decided that referent members in the genesis block had to be at least 4 steps away from each other.
 
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ To help us deter a Sybil attack, we’ve decided to impose a minimum period of t
 
 Here is a graph showing the evolution of a Sybil region with the variation of `sigPeriod`:
 
-![graph of the WoT's size according to sigPeriod and stepAttackers]({filename}/images/wiki/impact_sig_period.png)
+![graph of the WoT's size according to sigPeriod and stepAttackers]({filename}/images/wiki/impact_sig_period-2.png)
 
 As you’ll easily be able to tell, there is a strong link between the growth speed of the region and `sigPeriod`. As evidenced here, we need a `sigPeriod` high enough in order to ensure that the legitimate web can grow at least as fast as a Sybil region.
 In addition, the higher `sigPeriod` is, the more members will exercise their certification power gingerly, the action coming at a higher ‘cost’.