Repository move to 'libs' group?

DuniterPy is a library, not a client. Why not moving it there : https://git.duniter.org/libs

You are right DuniterPy is a library and libs group could be a right place for it.

DuniterPy is currently only used by Python clients located into clients/python group, which also makes sense to have it there.

DuniterPy is sharing the same labels with the other projects located in clients/python group. We can fine tune the permissions in case a new contributor join in. I think this is more convenient for us to keep DuniterPy repository into clients/python group.

In definitive, I am against this path change. I will let @vtexier express his opinion on that.

Thanks for the suggestion.

changed title from repository migration ? to Repository move to 'libs' group?

changed milestone to %Backlog

assigned to @vtexier

Now that you put the subject on the table, I realize that DuniterPy is more a toolkit than a library.

It overloads crypto libs to ease their use and provides classes, but also helpers and examples. And the heart of it is a client to ease python connection to BMA, WS2P, Cesium+ pods.

Thanks to help us clarify how to consider DuniterPy in the eco-system. Let's say it is a client toolkit.

We should let the repository in the current client path.

closed

is there alias or redirection capability in gitlab to help thoses who search it in libs to find it in clients/python ?