Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

id/lookup command does not display the non-member uids

    • Closed Issue created by Kapis @kapis

    if I try to find "silkaj id titi" it will show me:

    → 9zHLPCPwEH37wDfPpPoajt7zxP13xKFr5n9HY2CYtBEq:CPg 
→ 4qJZFRfArLaUMEXDhsd69unsKynEFNLFazAVij4HNsBa:F4z 
→ 4LCdTC9QsmqbFSHAhyaqGdDCVPr8Ywu2DZ8hDCzkdx4n:8ta 
→ CehfxBHrowP6tXouR73GS52QhGAoNMtabooKbCvT7f3j:6cG ↔ Laetiti974
→ FtZdA1HzHcDG6utoEgg6R5jjXfEne2ftS2UzvXajKurp:6Sm 
→ EUn8uLJxgc3fVXJ1fBA74re4iD4Ws8Nk2xHytX1wLMfK:AQ2 ↔ LaetitiaCarivenc
→ HqHZt9J1U7MwC3RF1bSjPgxACsTypfNjUThYFMZZfK6X:Dk1 ↔ LaetitiaHOFF
→ 5Vcm1zkHKoAMo9yy7Lk2HDX2Yn54agavtEUdrcFNmqkP:8mU ↔ laetitiajanot
→ BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ:7tP 
→ BWKuSHYojjwzAXZZxSFTf5XVWneUMZqoWGUJEfWaFRL9:21F ↔ titi43

    but actually the BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ pubkey was revoked as we can see here and it had the 'titi' username registered in the blockchain, see here:

    https://demo.cesium.app/#/app/wot/BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ/titi image

    could silkaj show those usernames in the same way that it shows for the other actives?

    Thanks.

    Edited
    To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information

    Child items 0

    • No child items are currently assigned. Use child items to break down this issue into smaller parts.

    Activity

    • Kapis changed the description

      changed the description

    • Moul
      Moul @moul ·
      Owner

      Hi @capiscuas, thanks for the report.

      In fact, id command doesn't help here:

      silkaj id titi
Public keys found matching 'titi':

→ 9zHLPCPwEH37wDfPpPoajt7zxP13xKFr5n9HY2CYtBEq:CPg 
→ 4qJZFRfArLaUMEXDhsd69unsKynEFNLFazAVij4HNsBa:F4z 
→ 4LCdTC9QsmqbFSHAhyaqGdDCVPr8Ywu2DZ8hDCzkdx4n:8ta 
→ CehfxBHrowP6tXouR73GS52QhGAoNMtabooKbCvT7f3j:6cG ↔ Laetiti974
→ FtZdA1HzHcDG6utoEgg6R5jjXfEne2ftS2UzvXajKurp:6Sm 
→ EUn8uLJxgc3fVXJ1fBA74re4iD4Ws8Nk2xHytX1wLMfK:AQ2 ↔ LaetitiaCarivenc
→ HqHZt9J1U7MwC3RF1bSjPgxACsTypfNjUThYFMZZfK6X:Dk1 ↔ LaetitiaHOFF
→ 5Vcm1zkHKoAMo9yy7Lk2HDX2Yn54agavtEUdrcFNmqkP:8mU ↔ laetitiajanot
→ BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ:7tP 
→ BWKuSHYojjwzAXZZxSFTf5XVWneUMZqoWGUJEfWaFRL9:21F ↔ titi43
      silkaj id BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ
No matching identity

      Looks like, wot command founds better results from BMA:

      silkaj wot BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ
titi (BfncGdTe…:7tP) from block #196594-00000660…
received 1 and sent 0/100 certifications:
|  received_expire  |  received  |  sent  |  sent_expire  |
|-------------------+------------+--------+---------------|
|    2021-02-28     | jbboyer ✔  |        |               |
✔: Certification available to be written or already written into the blockchain

member: False
revoked: True 
revoked on: 2021-02-15

expired: False 
wasMember: True
outdistanced: True
      silkaj wot titi
|   id | uid              | pubkey                                           | timestamp             |
|------+------------------+--------------------------------------------------+-----------------------|
|   00 | humezlaetitia    | 9zHLPCPwEH37wDfPpPoajt7zxP13xKFr5n9HY2CYtBEq:CPg | 393352-0000003AFEBCB… |
|   10 | laetitia97421    | 4qJZFRfArLaUMEXDhsd69unsKynEFNLFazAVij4HNsBa:F4z | 408557-000000276164F… |
|   20 | Amandinelaetitia | 4LCdTC9QsmqbFSHAhyaqGdDCVPr8Ywu2DZ8hDCzkdx4n:8ta | 111551-000000B7D00F9… |
|   30 | Laetiti974       | CehfxBHrowP6tXouR73GS52QhGAoNMtabooKbCvT7f3j:6cG | 358410-000000111DA54… |
|   40 | Laetitia         | FtZdA1HzHcDG6utoEgg6R5jjXfEne2ftS2UzvXajKurp:6Sm | 299789-0000033E1FF34… |
|   50 | LaetitiaCarivenc | EUn8uLJxgc3fVXJ1fBA74re4iD4Ws8Nk2xHytX1wLMfK:AQ2 | 256468-00000336EB969… |
|   60 | LaetitiaHOFF     | HqHZt9J1U7MwC3RF1bSjPgxACsTypfNjUThYFMZZfK6X:Dk1 | 151353-000002E9BF5A0… |
|   70 | laetitiajanot    | 5Vcm1zkHKoAMo9yy7Lk2HDX2Yn54agavtEUdrcFNmqkP:8mU | 285377-0000080146772… |
|   80 | titi             | BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ:7tP | 196594-00000660B5A75… |
|   90 | titi43           | BWKuSHYojjwzAXZZxSFTf5XVWneUMZqoWGUJEfWaFRL9:21F | 298036-000002CB92ADE… |
Which identity would you like to select (id)?: 80
titi (BfncGdTe…:7tP) from block #196594-00000660…
received 1 and sent 0/100 certifications:
|  received_expire  |  received  |  sent  |  sent_expire  |
|-------------------+------------+--------+---------------|
|    2021-02-28     | jbboyer ✔  |        |               |
✔: Certification available to be written or already written into the blockchain

member: False
revoked: True 
revoked on: 2021-02-15

expired: False 
wasMember: True
outdistanced: True
    • Moul added API: BMA Web of Trust labels

      added API: BMA Web of Trust labels

    • Kapis
      Kapis @kapis ·
      Author

      Thanks so much :heart: I was trying to debug why cesium won't publish the identity of a friend to become member (without errors apparently) and I went to silka to see the wot details...

      Btw, can silkaj or is there any plans to allow publishing/creating identities from it before requesting membership?

      Thanks

    • Moul
      Moul @moul ·
      Owner

      Yes, the management of the revocation and the identity documents is planned in #89 (closed) (testable in !170 (merged)), and #90.

    • Moul
      Moul @moul ·
      Owner

      I track down the reason why there were a difference between the two commands which are getting they information from the same place (wot/lookup). I found out that the id command wasn't reading the result in a complete manner.

      silkaj id titi
Public keys found matching 'titi':

→ 9zHLPCPwEH37wDfPpPoajt7zxP13xKFr5n9HY2CYtBEq:CPg ↔ humezlaetitia
→ 4qJZFRfArLaUMEXDhsd69unsKynEFNLFazAVij4HNsBa:F4z ↔ laetitia97421
→ 4LCdTC9QsmqbFSHAhyaqGdDCVPr8Ywu2DZ8hDCzkdx4n:8ta ↔ Amandinelaetitia
→ CehfxBHrowP6tXouR73GS52QhGAoNMtabooKbCvT7f3j:6cG ↔ Laetiti974
→ FtZdA1HzHcDG6utoEgg6R5jjXfEne2ftS2UzvXajKurp:6Sm ↔ Laetitia
→ EUn8uLJxgc3fVXJ1fBA74re4iD4Ws8Nk2xHytX1wLMfK:AQ2 ↔ LaetitiaCarivenc
→ HqHZt9J1U7MwC3RF1bSjPgxACsTypfNjUThYFMZZfK6X:Dk1 ↔ LaetitiaHOFF
→ 5Vcm1zkHKoAMo9yy7Lk2HDX2Yn54agavtEUdrcFNmqkP:8mU ↔ laetitiajanot
→ BfncGdTeq8qvhPZnBaM8T76SHM9xfx78ASRNZtGp64rZ:7tP ↔ titi
→ BWKuSHYojjwzAXZZxSFTf5XVWneUMZqoWGUJEfWaFRL9:21F ↔ titi43
    • Moul changed milestone to %0.9.0

      changed milestone to %0.9.0

    • Moul assigned to @moul

      assigned to @moul

    • Moul added Bug enhancement labels

      added Bug enhancement labels

    • Moul changed title from Id parameter not showing revoked usernames to Id command is not showing all the uids

      changed title from Id parameter not showing revoked usernames to Id command is not showing all the uids

    • Kapis
      Kapis @kapis ·
      Author

      Vi estas tre lerta!! Kia silka cerbulo!. Dankon!

      Edited by Kapis
    • Moul changed title from Id command is not showing all the uids to Id command does not display the non-member uids

      changed title from Id command is not showing all the uids to Id command does not display the non-member uids

    • Moul mentioned in commit 29362558

      mentioned in commit 29362558

    • Moul mentioned in merge request !171 (merged)

      mentioned in merge request !171 (merged)

    • Moul mentioned in commit 0488e6e8

      mentioned in commit 0488e6e8

    • matograine mentioned in issue #387

      mentioned in issue #387

    • Moul marked this issue as related to #387

      marked this issue as related to #387

    • Moul mentioned in commit 95df1dbb

      mentioned in commit 95df1dbb

    • Moul changed title from Id command does not display the non-member uids to id/lookup command does not display the non-member uids

      changed title from Id command does not display the non-member uids to id/lookup command does not display the non-member uids

    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    • Loading
    Please register or sign in to reply