Fix weight accounting

The problem is slightly different from the previously raised issue due to the deletion of instance pallets. Currently, the problem lies in having two tuple handlers (OnIdtyChange and Event). The weight of the function calling these handlers is the sum of each implementation. If these functions are not called in hooks, it will be possible to take the worst possible path as an approximation. However, some are called in on_initialize, and the worst case is close to 7% of a block, approximately 10 times the average path.

• Add weight return in OnIdtyChange and Event handlers.
• Account for the weight where these handlers are called.
• Replace all +=, -= by saturating_add and saturating_sub for consistency.
• Closes #163 (closed).
• Closes #203 (closed)

Note: Some handlers are difficult to benchmark using a benchmark function, so the accounting is performed by counting reads and writes, inspired by the staking pallet from Substrate.

Closes #167 (closed)

client/distance/src/lib.rs

@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ where
     };
     let owner_key = sp_runtime::AccountId32::new(owner_key.0);
 
-    let session_index = client
+    let pool_index = client
         .storage(
             parent,
             &StorageKey(
-                frame_support::storage::storage_prefix(b"Session", b"CurrentIndex").to_vec(),
+                frame_support::storage::storage_prefix(b"Distance", b"CurrentPoolIndex").to_vec(),
             ),
         )
         .expect("CurrentIndex is Err")
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ where
             &StorageKey(
                 frame_support::storage::storage_prefix(
                     b"Distance",
-                    match session_index % 3 {
-                        0 => b"StoragePublishedResults1",
-                        1 => b"StoragePublishedResults2",
-                        2 => b"StoragePublishedResults0",
-                        _ => unreachable!("n%3<3"),
+                    match pool_index {
+                        0 => b"EvaluationPool0",
+                        1 => b"EvaluationPool1",
+                        2 => b"EvaluationPool2",
+                        _ => unreachable!("n<3"),
                     },
                 )
                 .to_vec(),
@@ -81,18 +81,18 @@ where
                 .expect("cannot decode EvaluationPool")
         });
 
-    // Have we already published a result for this session?
+    // Have we already published a result for this period?
     if published_results.evaluators.contains(&owner_key) {
-        log::debug!("🧙 [distance oracle] Already published a result for this session");
+        log::debug!("🧙 [distance oracle] Already published a result for this period");
         return Ok(sp_distance::InherentDataProvider::<IdtyIndex>::new(None));
     }
 
     // Read evaluation result from file, if it exists
     log::debug!(
         "🧙 [distance oracle] Reading evaluation result from file {:?}",
-        distance_dir.clone().join(session_index.to_string())
+        distance_dir.clone().join(pool_index.to_string())
     );
-    let evaluation_result = match std::fs::read(distance_dir.join(session_index.to_string())) {
+    let evaluation_result = match std::fs::read(distance_dir.join(pool_index.to_string())) {
         Ok(data) => data,
         Err(e) => {
             match e.kind() {