[test] #262: Add verify blocks tests:

- Integration test on the overall function:
  - Use click CliRunner().invoke()
  - https://click.palletsprojects.com/en/7.x/testing/#basic-testing
    - integration tests are requesting a node
    - If the node is down, the tests are broken
- Multiple unit tests:
  - valid and a non-valid blocks signatures:
    - Kind of already in DuniterPy tests…

tests/test_verify_blocks.py

+import pytest
+from click.testing import CliRunner
+
+from duniterpy.documents import Block
+from duniterpy.api.client import Client
+
+from silkaj.network_tools import EndPoint
+from silkaj.blocks import (
+    verify_blocks_signatures,
+    get_chunk_size,
+    get_chunk,
+    verify_block_signature,
+    display_result,
+)
+from silkaj.constants import (
+    SUCCESS_EXIT_STATUS,
+    FAILURE_EXIT_STATUS,
+    BMA_MAX_BLOCKS_CHUNK_SIZE,
+)
+
+
+G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG = 15144
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("from_, to", [("2", "1"), ("20000", "15000")])
+def test_verify_cli_args_fails(from_, to):
+    result = CliRunner().invoke(verify_blocks_signatures, [from_, to])
+    assert result.exit_code == FAILURE_EXIT_STATUS
+    assert "FROM should be lower than TO" in result.output
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "from_, to",
+    [
+        (G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG, G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG),
+        (G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG - 5, G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG + 5),
+        (1, 10),
+    ],
+)
+def test_verify_blocks_signatures(from_, to):
+    # There is a client not closed comming from here. I don't know how to solve it.
+    result = CliRunner().invoke(verify_blocks_signatures, [str(from_), str(to)])
+    assert result.exit_code == SUCCESS_EXIT_STATUS
+    expected = "Within {0}-{1} range, ".format(from_, to)
+    if from_ == 1:
+        expected += "no blocks with a wrong signature."
+    else:
+        expected += "blocks with a wrong signature: " + str(G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG)
+    assert expected + "\n" in result.output
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "from_, to, chunks_from, chunk_from",
+    [
+        (140, 15150, [140, 5140, 10140, 15140], 140),
+        (140, 15150, [140, 5140, 10140, 15140], 15140),
+        (0, 2, [0], 0),
+    ],
+)
+def test_get_chunk_size(from_, to, chunks_from, chunk_from):
+    chunk_size = get_chunk_size(from_, to, chunks_from, chunk_from)
+    if chunk_from != chunks_from[-1]:
+        assert chunk_size == BMA_MAX_BLOCKS_CHUNK_SIZE
+    else:
+        assert chunk_size == to + 1 - chunk_from
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("chunk_size, chunk_from", [(2, 1), (5, 10)])
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_get_chunks(chunk_size, chunk_from):
+    client = Client(EndPoint().BMA_ENDPOINT)
+    chunk = await get_chunk(client, chunk_size, chunk_from)
+    assert chunk[0]["number"] + chunk_size - 1 == chunk[-1]["number"]
+    await client.close()
+
+
+non_valid_signature = "fJusVDRJA8akPse/sv4uK8ekUuvTGj1OoKYVdMQQAACs7OawDfpsV6cEMPcXxrQTCTRMrTN/rRrl20hN5zC9DQ=="
+non_valid_block_raw = "Version: 10\nType: Block\nCurrency: g1\nNumber: 15144\nPoWMin: 80\n\
+Time: 1493683741\nMedianTime: 1493681008\nUnitBase: 0\n\
+Issuer: D9D2zaJoWYWveii1JRYLVK3J4Z7ZH3QczoKrnQeiM6mx\nIssuersFrame: 106\n\
+IssuersFrameVar: 0\nDifferentIssuersCount: 21\n\
+PreviousHash: 0000033D8562368F1B099E924A4A83119BDA0452FAB2A8A4F1B1BA11F5450597\n\
+PreviousIssuer: 5WD4WSHE96ySreSwQFXPqaKaKcwboRNApiPHjPWB6V9C\nMembersCount: 98\n\
+Identities:\nJoiners:\nActives:\nLeavers:\nRevoked:\nExcluded:\nCertifications:\n\
+Transactions:\nInnerHash: 8B194B5C38CF0A38D16256405AC3E5FA5C2ABD26BE4DCC0C7ED5CC9824E6155B\n\
+Nonce: 30400000119992\n"
+
+valid_signature = "qhXtFtl6A/ZL7JMb7guSDlxiISGsHkQ4hTz5mhhdZO0KCLqD2TmvjcGpUFETBSdRYVacvFYOvUANyevlcfx6Ag=="
+valid_block_raw = "Version: 11\nType: Block\nCurrency: g1-test\nNumber: 509002\n\
+PoWMin: 60\nTime: 1580293955\nMedianTime: 1580292050\nUnitBase: 2\n\
+Issuer: 5B8iMAzq1dNmFe3ZxFTBQkqhq4fsztg1gZvxHXCk1XYH\nIssuersFrame: 26\n\
+IssuersFrameVar: 0\nDifferentIssuersCount: 5\n\
+PreviousHash: 0000EC4030E92E85F22F32663F5ABE137BA01CE59AF2A96050877320174C4A90\n\
+PreviousIssuer: Dz37iRAXeg4nUsfVH82m61b39HK5fqm6Bu7mM2ujLYz1\nMembersCount: 11\n\
+Identities:\nJoiners:\nActives:\nLeavers:\nRevoked:\nExcluded:\nCertifications:\n\
+Transactions:\nInnerHash: 19A53ABFA19EC77B6360E38EA98BE10154CB92307F4909AE49E786CA7149F8C6\n\
+Nonce: 10099900003511\n"
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "signature, block_raw",
+    [(non_valid_signature, non_valid_block_raw), (valid_signature, valid_block_raw)],
+)
+def test_verify_block_signature(signature, block_raw):
+    # Check with valid and non-valid signatures block
+    invalid_signatures_blocks = []
+    block = Block.from_signed_raw(block_raw + signature + "\n")
+    verify_block_signature(invalid_signatures_blocks, block)
+    if block.number == G1_INVALID_BLOCK_SIG:
+        assert invalid_signatures_blocks == [block.number]
+    else:
+        assert invalid_signatures_blocks == []
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "from_, to, invalid_blocks_signatures",
+    [(0, 5, []), (100, 500, [53]), (470, 2341, [243, 453])],
+)
+def test_display_result(from_, to, invalid_blocks_signatures, capsys):
+    expected = "Within {0}-{1} range, ".format(from_, to)
+    if invalid_blocks_signatures:
+        expected += "blocks with a wrong signature: "
+        expected += " ".join(str(n) for n in invalid_blocks_signatures)
+    else:
+        expected += "no blocks with a wrong signature."
+    display_result(from_, to, invalid_blocks_signatures)
+    captured = capsys.readouterr()
+    assert expected + "\n" == captured.out