Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481). Fix CI. Set endpoint options as mutually exclusives
Merged
Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481). Fix CI. Set endpoint options as mutually exclusives
481_revocation_600
into
main
- CI: Fix files changes detection
- Bump
pre-commit
hooks - Store revocation file with 600 permission
- Add ruff exception since it want it propose to use
Path.open()
which doesn’t implementopener
- Add ruff exception since it want it propose to use
- Set general
--gtest
and--endpoint
options as mutually exclusives
Close #481 (closed).
Edited by Moul
Merge request reports
Activity
Filter activity
changed milestone to %0.12.0
added Account D: Revocation Security enhancement labels
assigned to @moul
added CI/CD label
added 3 commits
- 45f1b859 - CI: Fix files changes detection
- e1bb54d6 - Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed))
- 65cba7f1 - Set general --gtest and --endpoint options as mutually exclusives
added CLI label
changed title from Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed)) to Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed)), CI fix, endpoint option as mutually exclusives
changed title from Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed)), CI fix, endpoint option as mutually exclusives to Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed)). Fix CI. Set endpoint options as mutually exclusives
added 4 commits
- 7eac8369 - CI: Fix files changes detection
- 8a029400 - Bump pre-commit hooks
- 4164679b - Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed))
- 46bc7cab - Set general --gtest and --endpoint options as mutually exclusives
Toggle commit listadded Dev Env label
added 2 commits
- fb21125f - Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed))
- da2f1283 - Set general --gtest and --endpoint options as mutually exclusives
added 3 commits
- 95ac53a2 - Bump pre-commit hooks: Ruff
- 8173b68b - Store revocation file with 600 permission (#481 (closed))
- fa03d43e - Set general --gtest and --endpoint options as mutually exclusives
requested review from @moul
Please register or sign in to reply